Talk:Main Page

Name
Shouldn't it be Meme.info, insted of Meemi.info? --Isokiho (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Otherwise yes, but that domain name is taken, thus unavailable. --Admin (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I sent the owner of the domain a message if they're willing to sell it. Let's see what happens. --Admin (talk) 14:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I think Meemi.info looks better, plus why buy another domain for the same site just in another language? --Eino (talk) 23:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Wanted pages
Link to WantedPages in the sentence "...found behind this link" doesn't work, should be WantedPages instead of Wanted_pages.--Jonne Webber (talk) 21:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Remove the protection that I can correct this shitty spelling
Yeah, that's all. --Sigmundur (talk) 11:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * In here we speak English. I translated your sentences. That's all. --Isokiho (talk) 09:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Uusi Mene
The New Mene is the best meme. It's brilliance is based on it's large number of possibilities to interpret it. At the same time it's a study about what can be considered as a meme. It questions the conventional definitions of a meme and that narrow context where the "real" memes are supposed to be born.

The New Mene parodically recycles the technically primitive memes forced by jonnes, at the same time making the unviability of the meme perfect and comprehensive.

This opens a whole new aspect on rendering the New Mene. Because the more experienced users are highly accurate of what kinds of elements a traditional meme should contain and how it should be introduced on imageboards. And because The New Mene is the perfect opposite to this criteria, forcing it causes powerful counteractions. This manner of interpretation has emerged very powerfully on foreign imageboards where the users have been highly confused about the popularity of The New Mene. The most common counterargument against The New Mene is that one lousy and banal drawing cannot be a meme. Hence The New Meme points out in a genious way the unspoken criteria that all memes are expected to bear. The exclamation "New Mene has been born" for one creates images about how memes can be given birth consciously. Even though most of the memes are born by intentional forcing and repetition, one does not willingly want to admit it. The memes are wanted to be seen without hierarchy, as a product of a successful organism. Nominating one person as the creator of the meme would wreck this cherished image. This is why the statment of a newborn mene radically brings out common beliefs that imageboard communities collectively want to maintain as silent information. Thus this information separates the expirienced users from the newbies.

The New Mene is popular because it offers numerous possibilities of interpretation and gives foothold for many different experiences. Grade schoolers find it to be just another funny drawn meme among the others. The experienced users understand it as a parody of the common criteria of the memes. The users who take imageboards very seriously gets to show their knowledge of the community's standards by criticizing The New Mene. This way they are able to experience a fictional rise in the community's hierarchy.



Vandalism
I am sorry that you have to see this, Meemi. Please start enforcing better rules so the vandalism (mostly by Checkem) will stop --Eino (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * User:Jonne1234 and User:Germano are also vandalizing articles, I am so sorry, really. ;__; --Eino (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Again, I am so sorry for the typo. --Eino (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

We are not vandalising we are only making them better :DD --Checkem2 (talk) 17:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

PS only one vandalizing is Eino and Brassinyymi :D --Checkem2 (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Eino is vandalizing like fugg --spürdo spär (talk) 08:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

hello
hi --Bubba Squeedo (talk) 14:07, 24 December 2012 (EET)